Conversation
lib/ImageData.js
Outdated
| if ( typeof directory === "object" && directory.regex && directory.regex.find ) { | ||
| const regex = new RegExp(directory.regex.find); | ||
| const output = this.dirName.replace(regex, directory.regex.replace || ""); | ||
| return path.join(output, prefix + fileName + suffix + extension); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think RegExp is bad idea a bit.
Because:
- Now configuration is
jsonformat. so we have to write regexp as string. - Configuration seems to become complicated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sure, I agree with complexity part, at least partially. It's because I think that better flexibility always will introduce more complexity, in one or different form. Also, keep in mind that we are not replacing old simple approach, we are just adding extension to it. So the RegEx configuration could be used only by more advanced users. But I guess I must agree, that this could increase number of incoming questions and bugs :)
If you feel that the path-template approach is simpler, we can start from there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Take a look at: https://github.com/ysugimoto/aws-lambda-image/pull/116/files
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, now we can use path-template approach.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah, I plan to do that
# Conflicts: # lib/ImageData.js # package.json # test/image-data.js
|
Please don't merge it yet, It's not fully finished :) |
2 participants
avadependency to0.18.2configtest(in progress)